About Me

My photo
I'm a simple man, not a simpleton. The worst thing any of our leaders can do is to get those two things confused. I'm a warrior for those things I believe in. I stand up for my friends, family, God, and country. All I truly want is for the government to stay as far out of my life as I can get it. Oh and just in case you haven't guessed it; I'm conservative in my bones.

Search

Custom Search

Saturday, November 28, 2009

Thanksgiving And Other Things

I tried for days to think of what I would like to have written about concerning Thanksgiving without ever catching on that one thing that no other blogs had written about. Most of the conservative blogs I visited spoke to our thanks to God for this great (if declining) nation and the opportunities our families and ourselves have enjoyed. I've seen blogs give thanks (deservedly so) for our troops that continue to put themselves in harms way. And not a few have tried to remind us that our families are our greatest blessings and should be cherished.


All true. I don't want to merely blog here and regurgitate the same old lines and topics that others spout. That has never been what this blog was supposed to be. So, here is what I came to in addition to what others have rightly posted.


I am thankful for my God, Country, Family, and Friends. I am thankful for those that have come and gone home before me. There will come a time in the future, and not so distant a future at that, that I will leave the fights and struggles of this world and assume room temperature, finishing my race finally taking my rest. I am truly thankful for that assurance, granted to me by grace. I'm thankful that I didn't have to try to earn it, but only accept the Truth and bend my knee with humility. My Lord takes care of the rest.


I was brought to this topic because today is a special day to me. Five years ago , I set down with my mother for our last Thanksgiving meal together. Afterwards, I took her to the Hospital and they admitted her with pneumonia. Three days later, five years ago today, she passed away. I miss her terribly and will all of my days. But I envy her, also. She was the very picture perfect example of redemption through grace.

I went to her gravesite today, and was struck by the fact that it was empty. Somehow that just didn't seem right, so I went and bought a candle and roses to put at her grave. Don't know how the fire marshal will feel about me leaving an open flame burning out there, but I wanted to shine a light for her. She placed a permanant light in my heart and in all those that knew her. She wasn't perfect by human standards, but she had an overwhelming love for Christ, and also for her family. I miss her with a desperation that feels like an open wound. But I wouldn't bring her back to this old world of pain for any price.

God bless you mom. I'll be following along soon enough, but I'm not done yet.

Saturday, November 21, 2009

My Thoughts On Recent Events

As I was looking back over the news of the last week, I can honestly say that there isn't one thing that I've read or listened to that I find even remotely surprising. I've been on the record many times both here and on other sites as saying that the push to further socialize medicine wouldn't stop. Even when, back in August, many were shouting that we'd beaten them and that the Dems were in full retreat. I said then that they weren't retreating, they were just slowing to give that impression. Here we are a mere 3 months later and just as I said then, there is steady progress towards the socialization of 1/5 of the American economy.

The fact is, there is nothing that the American public is willing to do to stop this from happening. Oh, many of my fellow conservatives are religious about blogging, writing their congressmen and senators, and even some have taken the unprecedented effort to actually march on Washington, D.C. or in a local Tea Party. Very nice, what have you got to show for your continued efforts and outlay of money? Silence is truly deafening.

Here's the facts as I see it. The socialists who hold power are in a very unique position. They hold Congress, the Presidency, and have the support of an activist Judiciary. They know that if they don't push with everything they have, there is no way that they will get the opportunity in the future. They know that they must continue to make progress to get at least one of their three planks of their socialist agenda passed.

If they do get this boondoggle through (and of course they will) then from this point forward you can expect further erosion of the freedoms that we have long taken for granted. The government has already taken to strong arming private company CEO's and private bond holders. As well as seizing private industries and nationalizing them. I cannot see anything that they would stop at doing if it kept their agenda moving forward.

Some of you are at this point asking what my point is. Simple, stop doing what doesn't work. Start refocusing your efforts on your state's government. For instance, the right of Nullification is probably not even being taught to our children. We need to educate our leaders and push for nullification movements across the nation. Also, the right of secession should be spoken out loud in public forums as much as possible. Every state has that right and the time is coming to educate and support those factions in our states.

I have also noticed, now and in the past, that many of you are looking to the next elections to fix whatever they do now. To this line of thought I'll just point out 2 things. First, I challenge anyone to come up with one socialist program that has ever been voted out by an incoming opposition party. Can't come up with one? Exactly. And secondly, do you really think that the Dems and their lackeys are going to allow fair elections? Each cycle they come closer to perfecting their means of stealing elections.

Lastly I will say this and then call it a night. I and others from my area are in the process of forming a local militia group for education and training for what must come. Our nation must remember what it meant to be an American back when we were in our youth as a nation. We must find that conviction, strength, and vigor and use it to retake our nation from the vipers that have usurped power they have no rights to wield. No longer will mere talking be useful as a means of coercing the enemies of Liberty. Civil disobedience is the next step followed closely by armed uprising.

That is the nature of the times in which we live. Each of you must make a decision: Either submit and remain quiet while our nation becomes the next socialist oligarchy or prepare for actions that will brand all patriots as extremists, criminals, and traitors. To either go quietly into that long night that all other great societies have finally gone, or be prepared to take a stand regardless of the cost.

Find or found a local militia. Train for war and educate on the foundations of this nation. Give them the tools to engage in debate as well as the martial knowledge needed to defend one's freedom and life. But decide and do it quickly.

Update On The New Job

Well, as I remember, I said that I'd be back to posting in five short days. That was over 3 weeks ago. So, here's the skinny on my new position. I've taken a job for a local company as a truck driver. Any idea I may have entertained that this would be a 40 hour, 5 day a week job, was brutally slaughtered by the end of my 2nd day out on the road.

In my first two weeks on the job I logged over 5600 miles. So that's the reason I haven't been on. The 1 day that I was off during my first 2 weeks, I slept most of it. It appears that 3 months out of a truck has made me a bit soft.

Anyways, for those that have asked, yes I'm still here. And yes, I am still watching and noting what's going on in the news. More on that in the next post. The long and the short of it is this, the lives and livelihood of the Ent household are secure once again.

Monday, November 2, 2009

Overcoming

Folks, I'm going to be out of pocket for the next 5 days or so... I have overcome the Obamafication of the Economy and the subsequent loss of my previous job. But it requires me to go over the road so I won't be able to post here until next weekend.

Have a good week and God's speed to you all.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

October's Rant

It's been just under a month since my last post. I've received several comments and emails asking if everything is good and when I'll post again. To those of my conservative friends that have asked, I would like to just say thank you. And now for the reason for the hiatus. I am so sick and tired of conservatives that just want to keep whining about our government. They send in mail and emails, or make phone calls to senators and representatives that give lip service and then do just the opposite for the sake of being "bi-partisan".

I am inundated with emails about tea parties and protest marches outside of media outlets. I am sent notices of email and mail campaigns designed to sway someone in D.C. to our point of view. The people that send me this crap on a stick can please just stop. You have tried it over the last 10 months. Millions took to the streets in tea party protests and over 1.5 million descended on D.C. in the largest peaceful march in my memory. Liberal law makers were sent into hiding during the August recess because they couldn't face their constituents. What do you have to show for the time, effort, and money spent on all of the above activities?

Way back when the first tea parties took off last Apr. 15th, I said that the government was going to ignore us and hope that we faded away as they normally do. I said, and was later proven right, that they wouldn't take us seriously. April went away and people planned for the 4th of July. That, too, went off like a cannon, and still the Mainstream media and the Federal government ignored us. Thousands of Tea Parties had taken place in hundreds of cities and our leaders just yawned and called us racists and Nazis. Millions took part in Tea Parties the day the Conservatives descended on D.C. and the President holds a pep-rally the same day 3/4 of the country away and declares that he will not be stopped.

And still, we plan new demonstrations. Still, we send in letters in the mail and on email decrying the actions of our government. And nothing happens. Oh the government has slowed somewhat on their mad rush to 1930's Germany, but they are bound and determined to take us there, by hook or crook. And still we plan tea parties for NEXT YEAR!

Dear God in heaven, give me strength. I am sick of it. I've got a friend in AA that says that one form of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect a different reaction each time. Well, my friends, I've come to the conclusion that we are either cowards, or we're insane. We as a people, have gone as far as we're prepared to go. The problem is that the Dems understand this and aren't going to stop. I told you after the big protests that they may slow down but that they weren't going to stop. Not with Government health care or with Cap and Trade. Work continues on both, regardless of the fact that the majority of America is against it.

As I have said many times in the past, both here and on other blogs that I frequent, there is a natural progress that must be maintained if a people wish to have their will enforced by the government. Phone and mail campaigns, public demonstration and then into civil disobedience. If all of those are ignored then it becomes necessary for the people of the U.S.A. to rise up and reset this nation back to its original intent. It is time for us to move into civil disobedience and prepare for the uprising. Everything that has come to pass has been ignored. We have two choices at this point: First, we can except that we have lost and go back to our lives and let what is coming, come... Or we can prepare to have 2 million people descend on D.C. again with whatever weapons they own, loaded and slung on their shoulder in a peaceful show of force. And refuse to leave. Period. This will force the government to either change their direction or (and I admit this is much more likely) force them to escalate to the level of open armed conflict.

We should prefer the former but be ready and willing for the latter. The reason for my dissatisfaction is that I hear way too many people say they are ready for the eventuality of conflict but they are unwilling to do as our forefathers did and force the issue with civil disobedience. People have become comfortable in their little social groups and have ceased to move forward towards the goal of retaking the seats of power and installing a regime with the original intent of our Founders in mind.

If you are not willing to escalate this fight for our nations future, then please shut up and get out of the way of those that are willing to. Let me quote something for you, and you tell me if it isn't descriptive of our current state of affairs.


Patrick Henry - 03/23/1775
No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The questing before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.
Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not [Jer. 5:21], the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it. I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss [Matt. 26:48]. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free-- if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending--if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained--we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!
They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us [2 Chron. 32:8]. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone [Eccl. 9:11]; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.
It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace [Jer. 6:14]. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle [Matt. 20:6]? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death
!

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Red Flags, Flashing Lights, Alarms, Alarms, Alarms

Folks I don't know if you are as concerned about the reduction of freedoms that have been taking place in America as I am. Likewise, I don't know whether you've connected the dots, seen the patterns, or however you want to say it concerning the "shadow government" that has taken roots in our country and how it is poised to take away liberty completely under the guise of "security", but if you haven't I envite you to visit/re-visit my post on this topic called "The Great Conspiracy".

Now if you don't mind, I'd like to add another piece to the puzzle, if I may. In "The great Conspiracy" I asked you to see our government in, quite possibly, a new way. To look at the long term policies and plans that have taken shape, by design, to erase the Liberties and Freedoms that we enjoy and replace it with a totalitarian regime. I showed you what tools were in place to accomplish that aim, as well as a list of things that could set it off.

There were those that I spoke to on the phone and in email, as well as a few commentors that claimed I was over reacting. Some, I decided to not even post as they really didn't add anything to the discussion. Others claimed that the military would never assist in such an endeavor so there would be no way for the government to pull it off. My response to that is two-fold, there have always been those in the military that see themselves as servants of the President and their chain of command. They MUST follow lawful orders. A takeover of the country laid out as it was by law and executive order is "legal" therefore many in the military WILL follow those orders. Others will do so because they are liberal in thier thinking and believe as other leftists do. But even if you believe that the military will be degraded in their ability to supress the population of America, keep in mind that Barry is planning a "civilian security force" that is "just as well funded" and "just as powerful" as the military.

Which brings me around to the real topic of today's post. Thanks to my friends at Radarsite for posting this video. It is, in my never to be humble opinion, the next phase in the government's plans. The creation of Barry's "civilian security force" is taking shape.


Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Obama Cult

People have poo poo'd me in the past when I say that Barry's followers have a cult like belief in him and will follow him in cult-like fashion. People haven't wanted to see what his followers are willing to do to fulfill his will. I've said that they will follow him regardless of the personal cost and in response I've been called a racist and delusional.

Okay. So, if so, I wish someone would please explain this video, where he is being prayed to by his followers.




Ok, I'll play devil's advocate for just a second and say maybe they are just spoofing God, either way, this is one creepy video and shows the moral breakdown of Barry and his followers. In fact, acording to breitbart.com, the woman who leads the prayer (the one in priest's robes) works in the whitehouse.

Sunday, September 27, 2009

An Objective View of Tea Party "Racism"

I gotta give the kudos for this from my friends at geeeeeZ! This guy was their find, but I'm shamelessly stealing a juicy piece of Truth.


Like The Boyscouts, Be Prepared: Survive What's Coming

Good morning folks. Look, it's no secret, if you've been to my site more than once or twice, that I believe that there is a fight brewing in this nation. It will be a fight between those that love their liberty and those that wish to impose government rule on everything we do. It will be a fight based on radical differences in ideology that are not or should not be compromised.

This could be the first real civil war that our nation has seen. The unpleasantness of the 1860's was not a civil war, by definition. The fight that is coming, will truly be just that. So, aside from going out and getting weapons training, there are other things that you can, and indeed, must do if you are going to survive. The first and best way is to learn to defend yourself.

Here is a video I recently found that will give some good ideas. The reason that I'm putting these on here is because of the potentially brutal responses to a dangerous situation. The person that attacks you will not be merciful, respond in kind.

A caveat: This is just one method, the methods shown have potential flaws, as do all forms of self defense. Think of ways that your opponent might try to counter these moves and adapt accordingly. Also, if you don't feel that these are right for you, please feel free to find other alternatives. But find them and learn them. Practice them often. Only by practicing with a sparring partner can these lessons be made instinctive. Watching something like this once and then doing nothing with it, will profit you nothing. Enjoy.



Lethal Street Fighting - Free videos are just a click away

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

A Tribute To A Lovely And Rising Star In Internet Journalism

I've been trying hard to find a video that showcased Hannah Giles in a tasteful light, but also shows how much we old men have lost out on. The moment some man puts a ring on her finger, will be a very sad day for all eligible bachelors.

Brave, beautiful, smart, and most importantly, principled. What more could any man want? She's done a lot to hamstring a corrupt wing of the D.C. machine.

Thanks lass!


My Lapse In Judgement: Pat Dollard

Generally speaking, I like to think of myself as a reasonable judge of character. Look back on my posts over the last year concerning our alleged President, and you will see that I've never missed the mark by far about him. However, this past 9 months or so, I've been guilty of a glaring misjudgement concerning an up and coming political movement. ACCDF. First, let me say this, 99% of the people that are in ACCDF are true patriots. They are from every walk of life and every nationality. The things that they all have in common is a genuine love for their country and a genuine fear that all that they hold dear is being destroyed by the radical revolutionaries in power.


"[A] good moral character is the first essential in a man..." --George Washington

Here is where my lapse in judgement comes in to play. I disregarded my still soft voice in regards to Pat Dollard himself. I went to his website (I forget now how I was referred there) and listened to his Internet broadcast. He was crude and vulgar and dropped expletives like rain water from a drain spout. I put that aside as I read his self-bio on his site. I figured it was just part of what he picked up while he was embedded with the Marines. Later, I found out that it was always this way with him. By then I had met others from ACCDF and found many of like mind. Also, Pat offered me a position on Patdollard.com (I won't provide active links to his site, sorry) as a salaried contributor.

Well, as a small town blogger, I was amazed, and I admit, flattered at the offer to be part of his website. His site gets thousands of hits a week (due mostly to his unfinished pro-military documentary) and I saw an opportunity to broaden my readership base. Unfortunately for me, and for those that have come here and (may) respect my views, I didn't do my due diligence before agreeing to work with Pat Dollard.

It didn't take long for me to find character flaws in Pat Dollard that I couldn't ignore. Soon after I joined his organization, he dropped off the radar completely for weeks at a time. No communication, no nothing. Then he comes back with a very vague story and picks up like nothing ever happened. This happened again this August. Only this time, not only did he disappear, we (accdf.com and patdollard.com) were both shut down for 3 days, and no one could reach him. Also, he had stopped paying me for my time that I had put in. He had offered to pay me $300. per week to work on the site, and at first all was going well. Then, he payed me $100 early on my second check and only gave promises in lieu of payment for the remainder of that and the two weeks following. That is when I stopped updating or writing for Pat. To this day, he has not paid me the $800 that he owed me before I stopped updating the site.

Recently, there has been a shake up in his ACCDF organization. Some of his leadership sent an email out to other state leaders and to Pat about the inaction of ACCDF and tried to offer ways to make it (ACCDF) work more efficiently. Long story short, it flew like a lead balloon and several of his leaders were put out of the organization. Granted, the toys belong to pat so he can kick you out of his sandbox if you don't play like he wants, but it furthered my belief that something was wrong with Pat's character on the most basic level.

So far, everything I've told you has been anecdotal at best. But just a few minutes ago, I was given a link to a Vanity Fair article that re-enforces my position on Pat and his intentions. He, unlike the rank and file of ACCDF, is not motivated by some overwhelming sense of honor and obligation where our Republic is concerned. Rather, he is obsessed with being back on top and running the show. To be a mover and shaker and to compete with his "best friend" Andrew Breitbart, of Breitbart.com. So far, the only thing that seems to be getting in the way is his own self-destructive personality flaws.

Read this for yourself, it's long, very long, but you'll have a very in depth look at what and who Pat Dollard really is. The title is "Rogue Agent: Pat's War On Hollywood" and I don't think there's a better bio of him or a more revealing look at the personality of a megalomaniacal manic-depressive than this article.

Read it all and then tell me if you think that patdollard.com or accdf.com have any useful future ahead of them.

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Calling All The Clans Together

This is quite possibly one of the best videos I've seen from the 9/12 march on D.C.. And yet another reason to be proud of our stand against the tyranny of our government.

Enjoy.

Sunday, September 13, 2009

A Blogger's Call To Arms

Last year, when I started getting serious about blogging and writing about the news, a point that I've always known at some level came crashing home to me. It was lengths and depths that the corrupt media will go to push the most radical of socialist agendas. They malign, distort, and try to destroy any media that comes against them.

Many times, i've talked with other bloggers and had them share with me their frustration at the inability that we conservative bloggers or even citizens that don't blog have in getting news with an honest and purposeful showing of the reality behind the prepackaged news.

There are several alternative news sites out there, such as Breitbart.com and PJTV.com. These are very good, but I think we need something else. What i'm looking to create, with the help of you my blogging friends, is a site, a little different than the others.

I want hard hitting news told from the true conservative's point of view. The honest to God unmitigated truth, related with the point of view of how it would combine with a Founding Father-type world view. I would also like writers that can do satire and humor, also from a conservative point of view. I want someplace that will draw fellow patriots for education, edification, and Entertainment.

I have been to and frequent many of my fellow blogger's sites, and I see every day the original takes and points of view from so many of my fellow patriots. Points of view and opinions or analysis that comes from a direction that I hadn't considered. Also, many of the best of you have sources of news and information that I have not had the time to find and utilize. Also, it would be hard for me to have time to find all the news and report on it myself. As it is for all of you.

So, here's my call to arms. In order to convince the undecide which is the correct path back to greatness for our country, we must win our fellow Americans back to the Truth. This requires us to fight propaganda with propaganda. The difference being the site that I envision will be dedicated to the truth and to our nation's history of Freedom and Liberty, granted by God, and affirmed through the Declaration of Independance and the Constitution of the united states.

So, I would like for those that are interested in joining such an endeavor to contact me. You can either contact me here, or in the off chance you'd like to remain confidential, my email is greywolfe226@gmail.com. I need folks that have a love for this country and a desire to push their blogs to the next level. To educate and edify more people than we can reach on our own.

I need Satirists, and Analysts. Common sense writers, and humorists. If you have a good idea or suggestion, I'm all ears. I want every piece of good advice that I can get.

This is a war, my friends. The Administration has declared war upon our way of life. In order to win, we must make sure that the truth continues to be told in places that the other forms of Alternative media are not seen. The larger we spread this idea, the more people we reach, the better this site can be.

The Conservative Underground News And Comment can be a great thing, but I cannot do all of it myself. Join me if you will. Advise me if you won't. I look forward to talking to you all.

Senior Care Under Obama Care

Texas Governor Sends Rangers To Mexico Border


From MSNBC


HOUSTON - Special teams of Texas Rangers will be deployed to the Texas-Mexico border to deal with increasing violence because the federal government has failed to address growing problems there, Gov. Rick Perry said Thursday.

"It is an expansive effort with the Rangers playing a more high-profile role than they've ever played before," Perry said of the Department of Public Safety's elite investigative unit.

The forces, dubbed "Ranger recon" teams, are the latest effort "to fill the gap that's been left by the federal government's ongoing failure to adequately secure our international border with Mexico," he said.

The governor early this year asked Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano for 1,000 National Guard troops and renewed his call last month in a letter to President Barack Obama. The request is bogged down over who will pay for the troops and how they will be deployed.

'Boots on the ground'
Perry's announcement Thursday comes amid increasing border violence, particularly in El Paso, mostly involving people with ties to Mexican drug gangs.

"They'll be deployed to high-traffic, high-crime areas along the border," he said. "They'll give us boots on the ground, put people in these hot spots no matter what or where they may exist."

Perry said the effort also would focus on remote areas where farmers and ranchers have complained of being overrun by smugglers and gangs from Mexico in numbers that also overwhelm local law enforcement and border patrol officers.

"Washington is shortchanging them, not giving them the support they need," Perry said. "As a result, we're having to dedicate our resources to deal with the challenges we have along the Texas-Mexico border and ensuing issues that porous border has created all across state of Texas."

He said the state would pick up the tab of $110 million, allocated by the Legislature in the past two sessions.

Perry's announcement drew immediate criticism from U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, who is running against the two-term incumbent in the March GOP primary.

"Today's announcement is yet another empty election-year promise from Rick Perry on border security," Hutchison spokesman Joe Pounder said.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

The Day America Shouted: And The Rulers Were Deaf


All day, I flipped from Fox News to MSNBC and ABC and then over to CNN and back again. I must admit that I will always regret not being able to attend that protest rally. The reasons for which I may go into at length, at some point in the future. But this day is not about my problems. Rather it is about the incredible spectacle in Washington D.C. today.
I was overjoyed at the pictures coming from Fox News and the positive note the coverage was using to pass the word. At the same time, I must admit that the other networks didn't really disappoint either. I flipped over to MSNBC just in time to hear the info-babe ask the reporter on site if there had been any rowdiness that resulted in any arrests. He was very honest in his reporting despite the info-babes attempts to lead the story down a false trail. He maintained that it was spirited but lawful. Even jubilant at times.
I will say that when CNN tried to cover the march and try to tie in Joe Wilson she was drowned out with chants of "Tell The Truth" and "Glenn Beck" and "No More Lies". At the very end she asks the crowd their opinion of Rep. Wilson and got a thunderous approval in return. Apparently, the coverage that CNN has given tea party protesters in the past has left a lasting bad taste in their mouths.
The fact that so many folks from every walk of life took time and money out from their busy life to gather and march with the intention of taking our nation back says a lot for the level of commitment present in America today. That is the good news. I am, unfortunately, here to post the truth that is starting to come to light about the affect that this march that totaled anywhere from 1.7 to 2 million people is actually having on our government.
First, I think it is important to note that the alleged president took the opportunity to get as far away from D.C. as possible to hold his own taxpayer funded event to attempt to counter the D.C. protest march. And from the parts of it that I watched, put himself in dead on opposition to everything the people at that march was saying.

Friday, September 11, 2009

9/11 My Tribute



















This morning I am watching Fox News' coverage of the horrid attacks that we survived on Sept. 11, 2001. I am trying to write this through tear filled eyes as I listen to them recount the names of the casualties of the World Trade Center attack. Every year, I've tried very hard to remember this day, to never make it just another day. Once again, I will try to do honor to those that died and those that willingly sacrificed themselves in a Pennsilvania field to keep the terrorists from succeeding in another attack. God bless those patriotic warriors that retook flight 93 and crashed it in an open field instead of the Whitehouse as was thought to be the planned target.





As I relive in my mind the thoughts and emotions that I felt, I am forced to look at the state of America and the changes that have taken place in our society since that day. I am trying very hard to keep my anger in check for those that have willingly forgotten these sacrifices. We must always be mindful that we have enemies that hate us and want to attack us for no other reason than that we live a life that they can only dream of. They harbor venom and bile in their hearts and will strike out at us. These must be hunted, they must be found, confronted, and finally destroyed. We must be true to those that have gone before and given their all.

I would like to bring it home to you, my friends that we must renew our resolve to destroy those that would mean us harm. We must resolve ourselves to support those troops and members of our intelligence community that have kept us from further attacks over the last 8 years. We owe them a debt that we cannot repay. Let us not take them for granted and let us not persecute those who have done that which had to be done to keep us from more death here and abroad.


God bless you my countrymen. God keep you and make your resolve fast. Our vigil is not done, and our fight goes on. God Bless those that have gone before, both victim and warrior. Your sacrifices are not in vain. We WILL remember.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Yet Another Reason I Love Sarah Palin

Here's Sarah Palin's response to President Obama's speech from her Facebook page.
Hat tip to Newsbusters.org for the full text.


"After all the rhetoric is put aside, one principle ran through President Obama’s speech tonight: that increased government involvement in health care can solve its problems.

Many Americans fundamentally disagree with this idea. We know from long experience that the creation of a massive new bureaucracy will not provide us with “more stability and security,” but just the opposite. It's hard to believe the President when he says that this time he and his team of bureaucrats have finally figured out how to do things right if only we’ll take them at their word.

Our objections to the Democrats’ health care proposals are not mere “bickering” or “games.” They are not an attempt to “score short term political points.” And it’s hard to listen to the President lecture us not to use “scare tactics” when in the next breath he says that “more will die” if his proposals do not pass.

In his speech the President directly responded to concerns I’ve raised about unelected bureaucrats being given power to make decisions affecting life or death health care matters. He called these concerns “bogus,” “irresponsible,” and “a lie” -- so much for civility. After all the name-calling, though, what he did not do is respond to the arguments we’ve made, arguments even some of his own supporters have agreed have merit.

In fact, after promising to “make sure that no government bureaucrat .... gets between you and the health care you need,” the President repeated his call for an Independent Medicare Advisory Council -- an unelected, largely unaccountable group of bureaucrats charged with containing Medicare costs. He did not disavow his own statement that such a group, working outside of “normal political channels,” should guide decisions regarding that “huge driver of cost ... the chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives....” He did not disavow the statements of his health care advisor, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, and continuing to pay his salary with taxpayer dollars proves a commitment to his beliefs. The President can keep making unsupported assertions, but until he directly responds to the arguments I’ve made, I’m going to call him out too.

It was heartening to hear the President finally recognize that tort reform is an important part of any solution. But this concession shouldn’t lead us to take our eye off the ball: the Democrats’ proposals will not reduce costs, and they will not deliver better health care. It’s this kind of “healthy skepticism of government” that truly reflects a “concern and regard for the plight of others.” We can’t wait to hear the details on that; we look forward to working with you on tort reform.

Finally, President Obama delivered an offhand applause line tonight about the cost of the War on Terror. As we approach the anniversary of the September 11th attacks and honor those who died that day and those who have died since in the War on Terror, in order to secure our freedoms, we need to remember their sacrifices and not demonize them as having had too high a price tag.

Remember, Mr. President, elected officials work for the people. Forcing a conclusion in order to claim a “victory” is not healthy for our country. We hear you say government isn’t always the answer; now hear us -- that’s what we’ve been saying all along.

- Sarah Palin"

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Barry's Speech To Congress: Here's the 'I Told You So'

I wasn't home for the live airing of Barry's speech so I had to wait until my wife and children went to sleep so that they wouldn't drown out the speech with loud and long suffering sighs and fingernail tapping. My family is probably the most apolitical group that one could ever hope to find. They nearly break out in hives when I sign on to my blogger account. So I waited until the time was right and was rewarded for my patience with one of the largest vindications for my cynical point of view towards Congress and this Usurper possible.

A point or two about Barry. He never actually comes out and lies directly. For instance, when he starts talking up the points for his socialized health care plan, he states "nothing in our plan requires you to change what you have." And from what I understand of the options currently on the table, he is technically correct. Except for the law of unintended consequences. Or in this case, wholly intended but entirely hidden from view. You see, as he stated later, public companies CAN NOT compete with a Socialist option, because it will have the financial backing of the Federal tax base. Even if you want to give him the benefit of the doubt and say that he has genuinely good intentions to follow through with his promise to not raise the deficit, the plan he has to pay for this thing, is going to cause almost as much trouble.

In addition to taxing businesses to help pay for this, he mentioned the tax breaks for the wealthy from the last administration twice. At one point he says, "Part of the reason I faced a trillion dollar deficit when I walked in the door of the White House is because too many initiatives over the last decade were not paid for – from the Iraq War to tax breaks for the wealthy. I will not make that same mistake with health care. This is an open admission that he intends to jack up the tax rate on those Americans that are the most productive. Keep in mind that most small businesses pay taxes on individual tax rates. He raises taxes and it will slam the job producers.

At another place in the speech he makes a very chilling set of statements. "...under my plan, individuals will be required to carry basic health insurance – just as most states require you to carry auto insurance. Likewise, businesses will be required to either offer their workers health care, or chip in to help cover the cost of their workers."

I found this chilling because it is yet one more way that government has found to insinuate itself into our lives. One more area where freedom and self reliance is eroded. How much of this is America going to take? I've been telling anyone that will sit still long enough to listen that they were going to ram this down our throats. Looks like I was right. Here it comes.

Barry and his Statists have complete bastardised the entire meaning of our Constitution and its limitations. They see the only limits to Federal power as the limits of their own social enginuity. Barry quoted Dead Ted's letter saying that this reform was a matter of "social justice". Leftist speak for wealth redistribution. God help us, when this goes through, we're done. Our economy will not bear up to the government dipping its fingers into 1/5th of the national economy without tanking.

Wake up America! This IS a call to arms. It's time and past time that we Americans made ourselves ready for the fight that is on the horizen. As I have stated time and time again, when a people's voice is suppressed, they must then turn to demonstrations. If those fail, they then have to turn to Civil Disobedience. From there it will get bloody.

We are at the point where civil disobedience is indeed called for. Many friends are going to go to D.C. for a march on the capitol. Damn I wish I could go, but its not to be. The groups that are there should commit to a mass show of civil disobedience. If their are indeed thousands that show up there, then laying a sit in siege to the capitol is something that is very possible and would have good effect.

The best possible outcome is that Congress might (although I doubt it) get the idea and turn from this course. The more likely outcome would be that the Capitol Police would end up shooting someone and thereby escalating this to the last level. It is coming folks. There will be blood. The Leftists have ensured it by their usurpation of the Constitutional powers set aside for the states and the people.

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Setting Barry Straight, Dragnet Style

Hat tip to Oliver and Ken at The Liberal Lie, The Conservative Truth.

Departure from ACTIVE and Patdollard.com

Effective immediately, I am resigning my place as a poster at Patdollard.com. This is due to conflicts between me and Mr. Dollard over non-communications and his repeated disappearances without letting those that serve under him know what is going on for days at a time. That goes for pd.com and for the leadership at ACTIVE also.

He disappears and there is no contact for days at a time. This was most notable last weekend when both pd.com and accdf.com went down to what we assumed was a DOS attack.

In addition to these episodes, there have been issues with payroll since my second week with the site. Payroll was not met and I and at least 2 others have received promises that the "check is in the mail" for the last 2 weeks in lieu of actual cash. I have given him the opportunity to make good on his promises and all he's done is let me down and lie again.

The loss in trust is one that would have been difficult for him to repair if he had made amends last week and made arrangements for immediate payment. But as he instead lied to me about the payment being on it's way, I am forced to conclude that my good will as well as my well being is of little or no consequence to Mr. Dollard. Therefore, I am also resigning my position as the Oklahoma President for Active effective on the 12th of this month.

For those that have signed up or thought of signing up do to my promotion on this site, I do not ask that you leave. But I do ask that, as with all associations, you make damn sure that the people you are associated with are above reproach and have good character.


Thank you and God bless you. And as always, Keep your powder dry.

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Sen. Inhoffe Blasts Barry's Anti-American Message

I'll be honest with you, I detest 99% of everything that comes from the Tulsa World. They have proven themselves to be very little more than Leftist Political Hacks who very nearly always spin events to favor the Socialists that have tried to run Tulsa into the ground. However, on this one article, they at least stuck to the facts. Good job Tulsa World.

And an even better round of applause for Oklahoma's Senator Inhoffe. You get it, thanks.

From the Tulsa World.

GROVE — Right-thinking Americans can only hope the country will survive the next 16 months of the Obama administration until Republicans can regain control of Congress, U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe said Wednesday.
“I never dreamed I would see an administration try to disavow all the things that have made this country different from all others,” Inhofe told more than 300 people at a town hall meeting in the Grove Community Center.

“I have never seen so many things happening at one time so disheartening to America.” Inhofe found a highly receptive audience. Many wore T-shirts of a local organization called Get America Back. Its Web site promises “a plan to eliminate the socialist government and return Americas (sic) freedoms.”

The “plan” is a link to a YouTube video by Lloyd Marcus, a Florida artist and singer making the circuit of anti-Obama “Tea Party” rallies.

Wednesday’s audience was similar to those at town hall meetings throughout northeastern Oklahoma in recent weeks. Concerns centered on the administration and Democratic-controlled Congress.

Inhofe gave his constituents plenty to worry about.

“Every institution that has made this country the greatest nation in the world is under attack,” he said at the end of the 75-minute session.

During those 75 minutes, Inhofe said President Barack Obama is disarming the military, is destroying everything good about America and is determined to turn foreign terrorists loose on U.S. soil.

The good news, he said, is that he does not think the Democratic leadership can push through

health-care reform or the more controversial parts of its energy bill.
He also said he continues to be proven correct in his claim that global climate change is a hoax.

“More and more, with each month that goes by, more scientists agree with me,” he said. “We are winning.”

Inhofe opened by saying the noisy debate over health care has caused Americans to overlook other important issues, including climate change and energy policy.

He is also alarmed, he said, by the proposed closing of the detention camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The Obama administration wants to shutter the camp because of its association with torture.

Inhofe said: “There has never been a case of torture there. The people there are treated better than in the federal prisons.”

He continued, “I don’t know why President Obama is obsessed with turning terrorists loose in America.”

The administration says it wants to bring 60 to 80 prisoners to the U.S. for trial. Some Republicans have said those acquitted could be released in the U.S., but authorities say they would be deported as foreign nationals.

Inhofe’s third concern, he said, is that “Barack Obama is disarming America.” He conceded that Obama requested more military spending, but he criticized the elimination of several weapons systems, including the F-22 fighter.

Obama, at the urging of Defense Secretary Robert Gates, also scrapped one of Inhofe’s pet projects, a cannon that was to be assembled at Elgin in southwestern Oklahoma.

Gates, a holdover from the Bush administration, advocated abandoning high-tech systems such as the cannon and the F-22 for cheaper, more reliable weapons.

“Those of you who think like I do,” Inhofe said, “hope this country can hang on another 16 months.”

Saturday, August 29, 2009

If You Speak Out, Look Out

The best way for a person that is in opposition to the powers that be to determine their effectiveness can be found in the amount of resistance one receives in answer to his efforts. This can be illustrated simply by the Pat Dollard sites. Let's review the last 3 months, the day that Twitter and other social sites got hit, PatDollard.com also got hacked. Site operation has been disrupted ever since. Then, due to "someones" complaint, Pat's paypal account was suspended last week, due to his site being "anti-Muslim". I would like to point out that it's not anti Muslim, it is however, anti-Islamo-fascist and anti-Jihadi.

And now, starting 2 days ago, we received a DOS attack (denial of service) designed to shut us down. This morning, sometime after 5 a.m. both the Active site and PatDollard.com were both brought down and are still shut down.

The interesting thing is, one of the last posts that I put up on Pat Dollard's site was the article by CNET about the bill that would give Barry direct control of the Internet. I do not believe in coincidence.

Understand patriots, if you come onto the opposition's radar, you will be targeted and every attempt will be made to shut you down. Pat says things on his site that most are not willing to. The fact that he allows me to post my observations without editing to make it politically "safe" is a testament to his willingness to push the bounds of Truth. To get messages out there, that the Left doesn't want spoken.

His effectiveness is the reason that both Patdollard.com and accdf.com have been targeted. The war is on, patriots. Make yourself ready.

God bless you and as always, keep your powder dry.

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

The Great Conspiracy

I posted these three articles yesterday on Pat Dollards site because I've had a "feeling" that something wasn't right. It's like looking at a maze and you know that there's a way through, you can instinctively tell, you just can't really see it.

Perhaps it's because the more I look into our Government, the less I like or trust. So here it is, all in one chunk. I'm putting them all in one post so I'm sorry that it's going to be so big. The information I give really can't be condensed any more.

The Great Conspiracy


Friends, today's post is going to be one of those that will make you want to put on your little tinfoil hats and start looking out of the side of your eyes at everyone around you. Or at least at anyone that drives a big black SUV with out of state plates. I want to provide you with some interesting facts and a rather disturbing hypothesis about certain events and chains of events that have been happening for the last several years. But before I get into those events I have to ask you to do a couple things for me: First, I must ask you to suspend your disbelief of the possibility of a government conspiracy. For some that will be easy as you see the government as the root of most if not all evils that are rampant in our Republic today. That is a topic that we can and most likely will debate later. For now, let's focus on this little piece of the pie. The second thing that I am going to ask you to do is to try to look at our government through the eyes of our Founding Fathers.

First things first; I need for you to go ahead and put on your little tinfoil hats and seriously consider the idea that our government has been planning for decades to disband and dismember our Constitution and do away with our Representative Republic as laid out by our Constitution and its creators. I need you to seriously think about how this might be possible given the advanced state of Leftist execution of their goals over the last 18 months.

Whenever a crime is committed in the public arena, one of the very first things that law enforcement tries to determine is whether there was a conspiracy. Many times, this does indeed seem to be the case. It seems that it is the natural tendency for those with ill actions on their mind to seek out others of a compatibly sullied soul to help them with their chores. Why then would we expect anything less from our government?

Our founders saw the government as an Evil. One necessary to the preservation of social order, but evil none the less. Much like a vicious dog can never be trusted off its chain, the government must be held under tight control with specifically designed powers to keep it from utterly devouring its own people.

James Madison put it like this in Federalist #51, “It may be a reflection on human nature, that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government. But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: You must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.”

Please keep this in mind as you read what follows. It is merely for your edification and an attempt to get you to look past the blinders that we all put upon ourselves in able to allow us to trust those that are called on to serve and protect us. We want to trust that they have our interests at heart, so we fail to see the evil that taints their actions.


Part 2: Pieces In Place

OK, so if you've come to this article, then you've possibly agreed to follow through on my two requests. Thanks, now hold on because we're heading down the rabbit hole on this one.

Now we are going to look at the tools and implements already in place by our government that could be used to strip us of our Constitutionally confirmed Rights and Liberties that we have enjoyed up to this point. In the last part of this series, we'll discuss current events and how they could be used to bring my Great Conspiracy to fruition. So let's get started.

The first and most glaring tool that the government has in it's Constitution pruning arsenal is probably the most successful PR campaign in the history of the federal government. The Federal Emergency Management Agency. This is the “benevolent” bureaucracy that everyone comes to for handouts when the City that was built below sea level gets flooded due to the funneling of moneys designed for structural upgrades to levies gets siphoned off by a crooked leftist local and state government. It's also, who will come running in the event of a national emergency, such as, but not limited to, epidemic, civil unrest, natural disaster, economic disaster, or just about any other local, state, or national “emergency” that might cause the government to declare a state of emergency within the U.S.

Upon such a declaration, the amount of power given to FEMA to perform it's mandate is staggering. Almost all of FEMA's powers are derived, not from enacted law, but by Executive Order. Here are the ones that empower FEMA in case of a Presidential Declaration of Emergency:

  • Executive Order #10990: allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
  • Executive Order #10995: Seizure of all communications media in the United States.
  • Executive Order #10997: Seizure of all electric power fuels and minerals, public and private.
  • Executive Order #10999: Seizure of all means of transportation, including personal cars, trucks or vehicles of any kind and total control of highways, seaports and waterways.
  • Executive Order #11000: Seizure of all American people for work forces under federal supervision including the splitting of families if the government finds it necessary.
  • Executive Order #11001: Seizure of all health, education and welfare facilities, public and private.
  • Executive Order #11002: Empowered the postmaster general to register all men, women and children in the U.S.
  • Executive Order #11003: Seizure of all airports and aircraft.
  • Executive Order #11004: Seizure of all housing and finance authorities to establish Forced Relocation Designated areas to be abandoned as "unsafe."
  • Executive Order #11005: Seizure of all railroads, inland waterways and storage facilities, public and private.
  • Executive Order #12919: Signs June 3, 1994, by President Clinton. Encompasses all the above executive orders.
  • Executive Order #11051: Specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
  • Executive Order #11310: Grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
  • Executive Order #11049: Signs emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.
  • Executive Order #11921: Allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months.
  • Executive Order #12919: Signed June 3, 1994, by President Clinton. Encompasses all the above executive orders.


With these Executive orders, FEMA is given the ability to suspend every Right given to us in the Constitution. And all that it really needs is for the President of The United States to declare a national state of emergency. It doesn't have to be a certain type of emergency either. This could be political insurrection, terrorist attack, natural disaster, or Michelle waking up with a bad hair day. There is no limits on what could trigger the uses of the above mentioned powers.

The next tool that the government has at its disposal to help destroy our Constitution is the Military Organization called Northern Command. The following is taken directly from The U.S. Northern Command website:
“U.S. Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) was established Oct. 1, 2002 to provide command and control of Department of Defense (DOD) homeland defense efforts and to coordinate defense support of civil authorities. USNORTHCOM defends America's homeland — protecting our people, national power, and freedom of action.

USNORTHCOM’s specific mission:
USNORTHCOM anticipates and conducts Homeland Defense and Civil Support operations within the assigned area of responsibility to defend, protect, and secure the United States and its interests.”

In the past, having an organization like UNSNORTHCOM wasn't a problem because of a post civil war era law called the Posse Comitatus Act. This act made it illegal, punishable by imprisonment, to use military forces inside the United States. With the exception of uses according to the Insurrection Act.

However, in 2007 G.W. Bush pushed for and got a provision added to a bill that allowed the President to use the military as a police force instead of being limited to use only in case of insurrection or rebellion. This drastically changes the balance of power and makes the creation of a martial law declaration much much easier.

To put the Feather in the cap, so to speak, in October of 2008, according to The Army Times, the 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team was assigned to USNORTHCOM for one year. These extremely combat hardened troops would then be rotated out and replaced with another combat team for the following year. This is a permanent shift to having combat ready troops deployed inside the U.S.

The germane point in the article, at least as far as this piece is concerned, is this part here, “In the meantime, they’ll learn new skills, use some of the ones they acquired in the war zone and more than likely will not be shot at while doing any of it. They may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control...

Now, let's leave this particular part of the puzzle alone for a second and jump to December, of 2008. A report by the U.S. Army War College, in December, 2008 talked about the possibility of Pentagon resources and troops being used should the economic crisis lead to civil unrest, such as protests against businesses and government or runs on beleaguered banks, “Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security.”

OK I'll throw one more little piece of information at you, and I want you to look at it in the context of what I've given you so far.

This is from an interview with Gen. Tommy Franks in 2003 with Newsmax: “Discussing the hypothetical dangers posed to the U.S. in the wake of Sept. 11, Franks said that 'the worst thing that could happen' is if terrorists acquire and then use a biological, chemical or nuclear weapon that inflicts heavy casualties.
If that happens, Franks said, '... the Western world, the free world, loses what it cherishes most, and that is freedom and liberty we've seen for a couple of hundred years in this grand experiment that we call democracy.'”

If our form of government and democracy itself can be set aside in the event of an attack inside the heartland, what other “Emergencies” might also trigger the loss? That's the topic of my next and final part in this series: The Great Conspiracy (The Triggers).

Friends, in my first post, I asked you to suspend your disbelief in a government conspiracy and take a trip down the rabbit hole and look at the things that have happened and been put in place that makes the idea of a conspiracy not only believable, but likely.

In my second post, I laid out the tools and authorities that the government could use to bring about a coup to upset the rule of law as laid down by our Constitution. I tried to lay out the “shadow government” that is FEMA, who would have control over all aspects of our lives. I showed you the military arm of the government. All governments rule implicitly through the threat of force. Through USNORTHCOM and its combat hardened troops, the people that gave us Waco massacre and ruby ridge have all the firepower needed to help suppress the citizenry. I also showed you that plans have been drawn up for how to deal with civil unrest by the Army War College, since shortly after Barry became the alleged commander in chief.

Part 3: Triggers

Now in this final post, I'd like to take you through the scenarios that are in place, any of which could be used as an excuse to remove the Constitutional restraints placed upon our government.

First, there is the very real possibility of a Nuclear, Biological, or Chemical attack (NBC) by militant extremists. I don't care if they are Islamic Terrorists or La Raza punks, or Mexican street gangs. Or even some other as yet unknown group that decides to take advantage of our alleged President's lack of backbone when dealing with homeland security and defense of the intelligence community, the resulting loss of life, according to Gen. Tommy Franks, be the trigger needed.

However, thanks to G.W. Bush pulling the pin and fragging the Posse Comitatus Act, the reason for the use of military force in America is much easier, so perhaps it won't be anything like that.

How about this scenario, starting with G.W.'s famous quote about abandoning free market principles in order to save the free market, and the reality of his opening the door to Barry's out of control “stimulus” bill, Cap and Trade bill, and the current incarnation of the House medical care bill and it's public option, and Barry's insistence on “comprehensive immigration reform” (translated: amnesty) our nation is fast approaching a financial Force Majeure. Simply stated, our debt would reach a point where we could no longer even service the interest and still keep our nation running in the black.

When this happens, the dollar will collapse causing a financial meltdown that will make the Great Depression seem like a summer stroll through a forest meadow. The civil unrest caused by such an event would decimate our ability to keep law and order and people would demand that the government step in and quell the uprisings, as well as provide for the basic needs and necessities of life.

Thus would FEMA be activated and total control of life in this nation would be transferred over to the Dept. of Homeland Security and FEMA.


The next doomsday version has to do with the dreaded H1N1 virus. This virus is currently responsible for the deaths of just over 500 Americans. This late in the year, that places the virus on track to take out a little over 800 people. Does that sound bad to you? Well, according to the CDC, the regular seasonal influenza is responsible for the deaths of, get ready for this, over 40,000 people on average. Some years more, some less.

And yet, what is it that they are using for their fear mongering nearly every day. H1N1 has become the new boogie man. This next part of this particular scenario requires you to put on your tinfoil hats.

When was the last time the government ever planned anything correctly with any specificity? The word you are searching for is “never”. And yet, last January, USNORTHCOM said that they had just completed training exercises preparing for an epidemic of swine flu coming from south of the Border. This was in the same month that the H1N1 virus was first discovered. To paraphrase Arsinio Hall... Things that make you go, “WTF?!?!” And if that doesn't make you pull your tin hat down farther, the senior scientist that helped to create the vaccine, says that in his opinion, the virus was created in a laboratory.

This is backed up by an article in a science news site called The Tech Herald. In the story it claims that the WHO was investigating the claims that the H1N1 escaped from their labs. Later, they denied the possibility and ridiculed the very idea.

If it was released with nefarious intentions as indicated from the admittedly circumstantial evidence, then it too could be used as a trigger for the activation of FEMA.

In light of these theories, Barry's championing of the South American treaty that would limit gun ownership and trading as well as reloading of ammunition by private individuals, and the House's attempts at passing bills, including the House's version of health care reform, that would create roadblocks to citizens being legally able to own a weapon without a federal license, becomes understandable.

Theories aside for a moment, there are some facts that I think need to be considered in context of my postings. First, with few exceptions all three branches of our government are populated with socialists and Marxists that see the Constitution as an inconvenient obstacle to the furtherance of their agendas. We have a potential usurper in the Oval office who has surrounded himself with self described Marxists, Communists, and Leftist activists. And the alleged president himself has more than once shown nothing but disdain for Constitutional governance.

So take the information I've given you in these posts and think about them. They may or may not be Truth, but they are worth tracking.

Thank you from the Oklahoma Patriot. God Bless you and keep your powder dry.

Sunday, August 23, 2009

Leftists Vs. Conservatives: Why There Will Be Blood

Bad blood between those that are in favor of an all-powerful federal government and those that believe in the power of States and their citizens is nothing new. It's been around since before the Revolutionary war. Each side believes that they are right, and each side believes that the other is full of revolutionary ideology that they see as dangerous.

I'll give you a current case in point, Gramma2Many stopped in and left a request for aid on my website, as well as(judging by the number of people that showed up on her site) a good number of other sites. Apparently, a Leftist from the UK decided to go on her site and start bad mouthing Americans that don't want socialist healthcare.

Long story somewhat shorter, several of my fellow patriots took exception to her statements and came back at her with proof(or at least as much proof as we could get from this side of the pond). To which she mocked each source and told us we were listening to the same old right wing lies.

When she finally decided to quit the field of battle, I gave her one last salvo just to make sure that she got the idea, here it is:

Yes, diddleymaz, this conversation is and should be brought to conclusion. What you fail to understand is that very similar to the Founders of this nation, we conservatives see government intervention as a means of weakening the people. Government subsidies are designed to make the people dependant upon a government for sustanance, so that the people have to keep coming back to the teat for more and more. All the while, their ability to stand and succeed on their own is taxed and limited due to government's never ending hunger for resources.

More and more Rights are taken away and replaced with suposed rights. Free speech for free healthcare, Right to Bear Arms for the right to Welfare. I could go on and on but I won't. The fact of history is this, Socialism has always failed in the end. It weakens the people and creates a moral equivalancy that destroys the family and society as a whole. Strength comes from self reliance and a true sense of community. These things can not be instituted by a government beurocracy, but rather by the removal from governmental interferance in daily life.

Europe has never come to understand that government is at best a necessary evil. Like a viscious dog it must be kept on a strong chain or it will devour the very people that it is to protect. We Patriots of America, refuse to give our freedoms up for supposed security. We refuse to lose the sovereignty that so many of our forefathers died to aquire for us.

It is a point of view that Europeans mostly fail to understand because they do not have our heritage. It is a point even some of our own Leftists don't understand because they still look to Europe with envy. They see the old world as an attempt at the failed idea of human perfection. Socialist ideals clothed in "culture". For those of us who value our history and heritage, its poison in a sweet cake.

You will never understand our point of view because you have allowed yourself to become dependant upon your government for your existance. God forbid that happens here.Is it any wonder why projections for Europe show the muslims becoming 20% of your population? Or why your governments have folded to Islamic rule so often? Europe is weak and the Jihadis know it. They outbreed you and have a strength of conviction your will never have.


So of course, she had to come back with this little rejoinder:

Greywolfe you are the sort of deluded fascist who gives me nightmares! we dont have spree killers all the time (no guns) and if you believe the rest of that stuff about europe your as stupid as i thought you were.

Because I point out the differences between Euro-trash and American heritages and because I showed her the ways in which her value system was killing the European nations, I am a "deluded fascist".

Leftists are supposed to be the all inclusive, big tent, Cumbaya types aren't they? Aren't they the ones that preach tolerance? I've noticed that in every conversation that has taken place between Leftist organizations like ACORN or the SEIU, that the Leftists don't seem to be all that tolerant or inclusive. Unless you count becoming violent and threatening violence to be inclusive and tolerant.

Here's the argument as best as I can boil it down. Leftists want the government to ensure that they never have to worry about the chaos and insecurities of this thing called life. They are willing to sacrifice any amount of other peoples money to make sure that this is the case. They are willing to sacrifice any Freedom, Liberty, or Right that other people might enjoy so that they can secure the government's promise for "security" for themselves and others that have not earned it. (See also the illegal alien argument). The point that there is no place in the Constitution that gives the government the right to do this is moot and beneath them to the point of being rediculous to debate it. The government can do as it sees fit in their eyes.

Conservatives on the other hand, see the promise that our Founders started for us in this Constitutional Republic and want the power to go back to where it was originally placed by said Constitution; the states and the people. We want the government to stop interfering with our lives and to allow each state to govern it's people the way it was originally intended. We want a strict constructionalist view of the Constitution and we want ALL THREE BRANCHES OF THE GOVERNMENT TO CEASE AND DESIST ALL ATTEMPTS AT COERCING THE STATES ILLEGALLY.

As you can see, the two opposing views are truly diametrically opposed and beyond reconciliation. We have reached a point of critical mass in this country. It is my fear that if the current legislation on healthcare, climate change, and illegal amnesty gets pushed through congress, the only options left to a responsible patriotic people will be to pull out that document that started our first war of independance, dust it off, fill in the appropriate places, and march on Washington with weapons in hand, ready if necessary to do battle, but demanding first the resignation of every member of our national mis-leadership.

Well, that's my little bit of sedition for one night. Good night and God Bless.

Thursday, August 20, 2009

There Will Be Blood


I posted this on Patdollard.com tonight. You can see the original here.




Way back before Barry’s coronation, I predicted on my site and others that I frequent that there would be blood in the streets. Not because, as the media would have the public believe, Barry is Black, indeed I’d have voted for Dr. Alan Keyes in a heart beat, but because I forsaw the death of our Republic. I saw the rapid jumps in Nationalized Socialism coming to this country, the likes of which hasn’t been seen since the rise of the Nazi Party in Germany during the 1930’s.

Socialism isn’t new to America, but because we have had no ruling class, historically speaking, socialism has had to take slow baby steps compared to the leaps and sprints of the European Countries. However, just as in every great nation that has come to peril, ours has reached a point where the wolves are not at the outer gates, they are in our very midst. We are indeed in a Revolutionary War in this nation. One unlike any seen in this country before. For this is a truly revolution minded group that sits in our places of power and tramples on the Rights and Freedoms that our Founders fought and died for, and that our God granted with grace.

The question was once asked of me how I saw the fight starting. As I saw it then, there were two conceivable triggers for the coming fight: First, I saw the possibility of someone assassinating Barry which would spark a race war from one coast to the other to make the race riots in the 60’s look like a walk in the park with your children. The second possibility was for the government to so constrict our Freedoms and Rights that the American people would lash out at the government which would respond with greater and greater strictures on the freedoms of the body politic.

Now we stand on the brink. As I now see it, the run up to a full fledged conflict with our government will take a natural progression. First, there are the protests starting with the April 15th Tea Parties, Over 1000 individual peaceful protests in over 300 cities, towns, and municipalities and the resident of the White House says he doesn’t know anything about them. Again on July 4th there were Tea Parties held and again they were ignored.

Now we have further demonstrations at these so-called Town Hall Meetings. Meetings where protesters are shut out, beaten by Obama supporters and refused entrance by leftist supporting Police.

Despite the outcry of anger and resistance to the socialization of 1/5 of our economy, not to mention ruining the best health care system in the world, along with the incredible hit in the polls that the democrats and Barry in particular are taking, our leaders in D.C. Have decided that they are going to follow through and ram this thing down our throats whether We The People want it or not.

When a people lose their voices, or the government loses its ability to hear their voices, then it becomes a Tyranny. We are on the brink of the rise of the soft tyranny of Nationalized Socialism. But always a hard tyranny follows the soft. I predict that Our nation will not long stand for this type of bullying. Pressure is rising in the hearts of patriots. Something will have to give and when it does, There Will Be Blood.

Thursday, August 6, 2009

Town Hall Meeting Taken Back By Citizens- Seniors No Less

Video courtesy of PatDollard.com
I'll just let this one speak for itself. I love these folks to death.



Oh Snap! Clearing the Barry vs. Birthers Air



This is from PatDollard.com this morning. All I can say is, "Damn. Sucks to be him." It's a long article....but it's worth it.


Western Journalism’s Editors Note: In December ‘08 a retired CIA officer commissioned an investigator to look into the Barack Obama birth certificate and eligibility issue. On July 21, 2009 westernjournalism.com obtained a copy of the investigator’s report. Here is an unedited version of the report.

June 10, 2009 Report, updated July 18, 2009

The Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii

I think that I now understand the legal background to the question of where Obama was born.

Let’s begin with the statement that Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the Director of the Hawaii Department of Health released on October 31, 2008. The television and print media used this statement as a reason to prevent and treat with contempt any investigation into whether Barack Obama was not born in Hawaii. But the language of the statement was so carefully hedged and guarded that it should have had the opposite effect.

“There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama’s official birth certificate. State law (Hawai‘i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record. Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

It is understandable that after such an apparently definitive statement most news outlets, whether conservative or liberal, would accept this as sufficient grounds to relegate the controversy to the status of a fringe phenomenon. Unless they happened to take the trouble to look into the “state policies and procedures” as laid down by the relevant statutes. If they had done so, they would have seen that Dr. Fukino’s press release was carefully hedged and “lawyered” and practically worthless. But the media in general should not be faulted. The statement seems to roll out with such bureaucratic certainty and final authority. I believed it to be significant until a Honolulu attorney mailed me the relevant statutes. I was so surprised that I laughed out loud.

Here is a summary of Hawaii’s “state policies and procedures” in 1961.

In the State of Hawaii, back in 1961, there were four different ways to get an “original birth certificate” on record. They varied greatly in their reliability as evidence. For convenience, I’ll call them BC1, BC2, BC3, and BC4.

BC1. If the birth was attended by a physician or mid wife, the attending medical professional was required to certify to the Department of Health the facts of the birth date, location, parents’ identities and other information. (See Section 57-8 & 9 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).

BC2. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or midwife, then all that was required was that one of the parents send in a birth certificate to be filed. The birth certificate could be filed by mail. There appears to have been no requirement for the parent to actually physically appear before “the local registrar of the district.” It would have been very easy for a relative to forge an absent parent’s signature to a form and mail it in. In addition, if a claim was made that “neither parent of the newborn child whose birth is unattended as above provided is able to prepare a birth certificate, the local registrar shall secure the necessary information from any person having knowledge of the birth and prepare and file the certificate.” (Section 57-8&9) I asked the Dept of Health what they currently ask for (in 2008) to back up a parent’s claim that a child was born in Hawaii. I was told that all they required was a proof of residence in Hawaii (e.g. a driver’s license [We know from interviews with her friends on Mercer Island in Washington State that Ann Dunham had acquired a driver’s license by the summer of 1961 at the age of 17] or telephone bill) and pre-natal (statement or report that a woman was pregnant) and post-natal (statement or report that a new-born baby has been examined) certification by a physician. On further enquiry, the employee that I spoke to informed me that the pre-natal and post-natal certifications had probably not been in force in the ‘60s. Even if they had been, there is and was no requirement for a physician or midwife to witness, state or report that the baby was born in Hawaii.

BC3. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or midwife, then, up to the first birthday of the child, a “Delayed Certificate” could be filed, which required that “a summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for delayed filing or the alteration [of a file] shall be endorsed on the certificates”, which “evidence shall be kept in a special permanent file.” The statute provided that “the probative value of a ‘delayed’ or ‘altered’ certificate shall be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence.” (See Section 57- 9, 18, 19 & 20 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).”

[In other words, this form of vault birth certificate, the Delayed Certificate, required no more than a statement before a government bureaucrat by one of the parents or (the law does not seem to me clear on this) one of Barack Obama’s grandparents. If the latter is true, Ann Dunham did not have to be present for this statement or even in the country.]

BC4. If a child is born in Hawaii, for whom no physician or mid wife filed a certificate of live birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate was filed before the first birthday, then a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth could be issued upon testimony of an adult (including the subject person [i.e. the birth child as an adult]) if the Office of the Lieutenant Governor was satisfied that a person was born in Hawaii, provided that the person had attained the age of one year. (See Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961.) In 1955 the “secretary of the Territory” was in charge of this procedure. In 1960 it was transferred to the Office of the Lieutenant Governor (“the lieutenant governor, or his secretary, or such other person as he may designate or appoint from his office” §338-41 [in 1961]).




In 1982, the vital records law was amended to create a fifth kind of “original birth certificate”. Under Act 182 H.B. NO. 3016-82, “Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that the proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.” In this way “state policies and procedures” accommodate even “children born out of State” (this is the actual language of Act 182) with an “original birth certificate on record.” So it is even possible that the birth certificate referred to by Dr Fukino is of the kind specified in Act 182. This possibility cannot be dismissed because such a certificate certainly satisfies Dr Fukino’s statement that “I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.” If this is the case, Dr Fukino would have perpetrated so unusually disgusting a deception that I find it practically incredible (and I greatly doubt that anyone could be that shameless). On the other hand, if the original birth certificate is of types 2, 3, or 4, Dr Fukino’s statement would be only somewhat less deceptive and verbally tricky. I only bring up this possibility to show how cleverly hedged and “lawyered” and basically worthless Dr Fukino’s statement is.

Sections 57-8, 9, 18, 19, 20 & 40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act explain why Barack Obama has refused to release the original vault birth certificate. If the original certificate were the standard BC1 type of birth certificate, he would have allowed its release and brought the controversy to a quick end. But if the original certificate is of the other kinds, then Obama would have a very good reason not to release the vault birth certificate. For if he did, then the tape recording of Obama’s Kenyan grandmother asserting that she was present at his birth in Kenya becomes far more important. As does the Kenyan ambassador’s assertion that Barack Obama was born in Kenya, as well as the sealing of all government and hospital records relevant to Obama by the Kenyan government. And the fact that though there are many witnesses to Ann Dunham’s presence on Oahu from Sept 1960 to Feb 1961, there are no witnesses to her being on Oahu from March 1961 to August 1962 when she returned from Seattle and the University of Washington. No Hawaiian physicians, nurses, or midwives have come forward with any recollection of Barack Obama’s birth.

The fact that Obama refuses to release the vault birth certificate that would instantly clear up this matter almost certainly indicates that the vault birth certificate is probably a BC2 or possibly a BC3.

It is almost certainly a BC 3 or even a BC 4 if the “Certification of Live Birth” posted on the Daily Kos blog and the fightthesmears.com website by the Obama campaign is a forgery. Ron Polarik has made what several experts claim to be a cogent case that it is a forgery. There have been a couple of attempts to refute his argument and Polarik has replied to the most extensive of them. I do not claim expertise in this area, but I think it would be best for journalists and politicians to familiarize themselves with the arguments on both sides before they casually dismiss Polarik’s position without taking the trouble to understand it.

Here are 2 of Polarik’s websites: http://bogusbirthcertificate.blogspot.com/

http://bogusbithcertificate.blogspot.com/

Because the disputants know far more about this subject than I do, I am an agnostic about Polarik’s argument. However, the likelihood that this computer-generated “Certification of Live Birth” was forged, is, I believe, increased by the fact that it has been pretty clearly established that Obama “either didn’t register for the draft or did so belatedly and fraudulently. The documents indicate that it’s one or the other.” http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/004431print.html The forgery of Obama’s selective service registration was necessary, because according to Federal law, “A man must be registered to be eligible for jobs in the Executive Branch of the Federal government and the U.S. Postal Service. This applies only to men born after December 31, 1959.” http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/wars/a/draft2.htm)

It is also very strange that Dr Fukino’s statement in no way attested to (or even addressed the issue of) the authenticity of the “Certification of Live Birth” (and the information that appears on it) that the Daily Kos blog and the Obama campaign posted on line. Dr Fukino merely stated that “I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

If there is no hospital or physician record in the vault birth certificate, then he wasn’t born in a hospital in Hawaii. And a home birth or non-hospital birth can then be ruled out for the following reason.

When someone has a home birth or is not born in a hospital, this becomes a part of his family’s lore and is now and again spoken of by his parents. He and his siblings grow up knowing that he was born at home or his uncle’s house, etc. The fact that someone in the campaign told a Washington Post reporter that he was born in Kapioliani hospital and his sister said he was born at Queens hospital indicates that there was not and is not any Obama/Dunham family memory of a home birth or non-hospital birth in Hawaii.

And if there is no hospital record in the original vault birth certificate, then he was not born in a hospital in Hawaii.

Instead of the birth certificate on file at the Hawaii Dept of Health, the Obama campaign posted on the Daily Kos blog and the Fightthesmears website a “Certification of Live Birth”. The Certification of Live Birth is not a copy of the original birth certificate. It is a computer-generated document that the state of Hawaii issues on request to indicate that a birth certificate of some type is “on record in accordance with state policies and procedures”. And there is the problem. Given the statutes in force in 1961, the Certification of Live Birth proves nothing unless we know what is on the original birth certificate. There are several legal areas (involving ethnic quotas and subsidy) for which the state of Hawaii up until June 2009 did not accept its computer-generated Certification of Live Birth as sufficient proof of birth in Hawaii or parentage. Why should the citizens of the United States be content with lower standards for ascertaining the qualifications of their President?

If you combine an awareness of what the Certification of Live Birth posted on the internet really is with 1) a knowledge of the relevant statutes in 1961 and 2) Obama’s stubborn refusal to permit the release of the real birth certificate and his determination to fight any legal actions that would compel him to do so, it becomes clear that there is no logical explanation for Obama’s refusal without taking into consideration the relevant statutes. Then his behavior becomes clear. The Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii is the missing piece of the puzzle.

Most people think of a birth certificate as a statement by a hospital or midwife with a footprint, etc. (That may be why some main-stream journalists have straight out lied about this. Jonathan Alter, senior editor at Newsweek magazine, for example, told Keith Olbermann on MSNBC on Feb 20, 2009 that “They [the Republicans] are a party that is out of ideas so they have to resort to these lies about the fact that he’s not a citizen. This came up during the campaign, Keith. The Obama campaign actually posted his birth certificate from a Hawaii hospital online.” But it is Alter who resorted to lying to the American people on television. “The Obama campaign” never “actually posted his birth certificate from a Hawaii hospital online.” On July 17, 2009 CNN’s Kitty Pilgrim lied when she stated that the Obama campaign had produced “the original birth certificate” on the internet and that FactCheck.org had examined the original birth certificate; whether it was forged or not, the Certification of Live Birth that was posted by the campaign and FactCheck.org is not, and by definition, cannot be the original birth certificate or a copy of the original birth certificate. There were no computer generated Certifications of Live Birth in 1961, the year Obama was born. Obama’s original birth certificate (whether it was filed in 1961 or later) was a very different document from the Certification of Live Birth on FactCheck.org. On the FactCheck.org web site, the claim is made that “FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate.” So FactCheck.org is lying about this as well.

FactCheck.org gets its prestige from a reputation for objectivity. Why would those who run this site choose to tell so obvious a lie and so endanger the site’s reputation? The answer is in the date of the posting, August 21, 2008. It was in mid-August that questions about the Certification of Live Birth began to reach a critical mass and threaten to enter the public discourse. The mostly pro-Obama television and newspaper/magazine media had to be given an excuse and cover for their collective decision to dismiss or ignore the substantial questions about whether Obama met the qualifications for the office set forth in Article II section I of the Constitution. And those reporters and editors who were not in the tank for Obama had to be deceived. After Labor Day the swing voters would begin to pay attention to the Presidential campaign. The truth had to be killed. And with its lie about “how it examined and photographed the original birth certificate“, FactCheck.org killed it.)

Most people would not consider a mailed-in form by one of his parents (who could have been out of the country or whose signature could have been forged by a grandparent) or a sworn statement by one of his grandparents or by his mother or even a sworn statement by himself many years later to be sufficient evidence (when set next to the statements by his maternal grandmother and the Kenyan ambassador that he was born in another country). Unless the American people are shown the original birth certificate, all of these are possibilities. And if Obama refuses to allow the state of Hawaii to release the original birth certificate, it begins to look like he was not born in a Hawaii hospital or at home with the assistance of a doctor or midwife. A reasonable person would acknowledge that there are serious reasons to doubt that Barack Obama was born in the United States. This is especially true because, if Obama was born in a foreign country, his family had a compelling reason to lie about it.

In 1961 if a 17 year old American girl gave birth in a foreign country to a child whose father was not an American citizen, that child had no right to any American citizenship, let alone the “natural born” citizenship that qualifies someone for the Presidency under Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution.

In 1961, the year that Barack Obama was born, under Sec. 301 (a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, Ann Dunham could not transmit citizenship of any kind to Barack Obama.

“ 7 FAM 1133.2-2 Original Provisions and Amendments to Section 301

(CT:CON-204; 11-01-2007)

“a. Section 301 as Effective on December 24, 1952: When enacted in 1952, section 301 required a U.S. citizen married to an alien to have been physically present in the United States for ten years, including five after reaching the age of fourteen, to transmit citizenship to foreign-born children. The ten-year transmission requirement remained in effect from 12:01 a.m. EDT December 24, 1952, through midnight November 13, 1986, and still is applicable to persons born during that period.

“As originally enacted, section 301(a)(7) stated: Section 301. (a) The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: (7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States by such citizen parent may be included in computing the physical presence requirements of this paragraph.”

The Immigration and Nationality Corrections Act (Public Law 103-416) on October 25, 1994 revised this law to accommodate “a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years”.

But in 1961, if Barack Obama had been born outside of the country, the Dunham family had no way of knowing that in 1994 Congress would pass a law that would retroactively make him a citizen. At that time, the only way to get citizenship for him would be to take advantage of one of the loopholes in the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act.

People can debate the meaning of the term “natural-born citizen” as long as they like but this is clear: If, in 1961, 17 year old Ann Dunham gave birth to a child on foreign soil whose father was not an American citizen, then the Immigration and Nationality Act at that time denied Barack Obama any right to American citizenship of any kind. Therefore if at the time of his birth Obama was ineligible for American citizenship of any kind, then he cannot be a “natural-born citizen”. This is true even if the Immigration and Nationality Act was changed 33 years after he was born. Even if the law was retroactively changed to grant citizenship (but not “natural-born” citizenship) to some of those who had at birth been denied it. If a person is not at the time of his birth an American citizen, he cannot be a natural-born citizen. Therefore, that person is ineligible under Article II, Section1 for the Office of President of the United States.

It is only by examining the 18th century usage and definition of a term that we can ascertain its meaning in the Constitution. In the 18th century, and at the time of the framing and ratification of the Constitution by the states, the term “natural-born” subject or citizen was always used or defined in such a way as to exclude the child of a British or American girl or woman when that child was born in a foreign country and that child’s father was a foreign citizen. No 18th century jurist would have thought the term “natural-born” citizen or subject could have been extended to the child of a British or American girl or woman when that child was born in a foreign country and that child’s father was a foreign citizen.

Here is Blackstone’s classic exposition in 1765 of the legal meaning of the term from the Commentaries on the Laws of England.

William Blackstone, Commentaries 1:354, 357–58, 361–62

1765

“Natural-born subjects are such as are born within the dominions of the crown of England, that is, within the ligeance, or as it is generally called, the allegiance of the king; and aliens, such as are born out of it.. . .

“When I say, that an alien is one who is born out of the king’s dominions, or allegiance, this also must be understood with some restrictions. The common law indeed stood absolutely so; with only a very few exceptions: so that a particular act of parliament became necessary after the restoration, for the naturalization of children of his majesty’s English subjects, born in foreign countries during the late troubles. And this maxim of the law proceeded upon a general principle, that every man owes natural allegiance where he is born, and cannot owe two such allegiances, or serve two masters, at once. Yet the children of the king’s embassadors born abroad were always held to be natural subjects: for as the father, though in a foreign country, owes not even a local allegiance to the prince to whom he is sent; so, with regard to the son also, he was held (by a kind of postliminium) to be born under the king of England’s allegiance, represented by his father, the embassador. To encourage also foreign commerce, it was enacted by statute 25 Edw. III. st. 2. that all children born abroad, provided both their parents were at the time of the birth in allegiance to the king,…might inherit as if born in England: and accordingly it hath been so adjudged in behalf of merchants. But by several more modern statutes these restrictions are still farther taken off: so that all children, born out of the king’s ligeance, whose fathers were natural-born subjects, are now natural-born subjects themselves, to all intents and purposes, without any exception; unless their said fathers were attainted, or banished beyond sea, for high treason; or were then in the service of a prince at enmity with Great Britain.” [The italics are Blackstone's]

The irresponsible confirmation in the Senate of the irresponsible tallying of votes in the Electoral College does not supersede the clear meaning of Article II, Section 1. If it is allowed to stand, disregard of the Constitution by all branches of the government would be openly established. To all who believe that the Constitution is the government’s basic law, that the Constitution is the only instrument that gives the enactments of Congress and the commands of the Executive validity, it will be clear that the rule of law in the United States is a fiction.

Journalists and politicians complain that we must avoid a Constitutional crisis, but there already is a Constitutional crisis. It has been caused by Obama’s refusal to take the simple step to clear the matter up. The power of the Executive branch has been compromised. Its right to collect taxes and sign Congressional enactments into law, in fact all of its powers, have become problematic. Since their validity under Section I is now doubtful, they depend on the illegal exercise of force. Since officers of the American military take their oath on commissioning to the Constitution and not the President, their obedience to the Commander-in-Chief has lapsed and, if they challenge or resist his authority, any courts-martial will also be an illegal exercise of force. The only way out of the present Constitutional crisis is for Obama to do as McCain did when he was confronted by far less pressing doubts about the circumstances of his birth. He must disclose his vault birth certificate. Since the document has been so suspiciously withheld for so long, it should be subjected to rigorous forensic tests. Then whatever is on it should be judicially assessed together with the claims that have been made that Barack Obama was born on foreign soil.

It should be added that “Obama’s top terrorism and intelligence adviser, John O. Brennan, heads a firm that was cited in March for breaching sensitive files in the State Department’s passport office, according to a State Department Inspector General’s report released this past July.

“The security breach, first reported by the Washington Times and later confirmed by State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, involved a contract employee of Brennan’s firm, The Analysis Corp., which has earned millions of dollars providing intelligence-related consulting services to federal agencies and private companies.

“During a State Department briefing on March 21, 2008, McCormack confirmed that the contractor had accessed the passport files of presidential candidates Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and John McCain, and that the inspector general had launched an investigation.

“Sources who tracked the investigation tell Newsmax that the main target of the breach was the Obama passport file, and that the contractor accessed the file in order to ‘cauterize’ the records of potentially embarrassing information.

“ ‘They looked at the McCain and Clinton files as well to create confusion,’ one knowledgeable source told Newsmax. ‘But this was basically an attempt to cauterize the Obama file.’

“At the time of the breach, Brennan was working as an unpaid adviser to the Obama campaign.

” ‘This individual’s actions were taken without the knowledge or direction of anyone at The Analysis Corp. and are wholly inconsistent with our professional and ethical standards,’ Brennan’s company said in a statement sent to reporters after the passport breach was made public.

“The passport files include ‘personally identifiable information such as the applicant’s name, gender, social security number, date and place of birth, and passport number,’ according to the inspector general report.

“The files may contain additional information including ‘original copies of the associated documents,’ the report added. Such documents include birth certificates, naturalization certificates, or oaths of allegiance for U.S.-born persons who adopted the citizenship of a foreign country as minors.”

“The State Department Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a 104-page report on the breach last July. Although it is stamped ‘Sensitive but Unclassified,’ the report was heavily redacted in the version released to the public, with page after page blacked out entirely.”

http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/brennan_passport_breach/2009/01/12/170430.html

The following may be relevant:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/apr/19/key-witness-in-passport-fraud-case-fatally-shot/

Key witness in passport fraud case fatally shot

Saturday, April 19, 2008

“A key witness in a federal probe into passport information stolen from the State Department was fatally shot in front of a District church, the Metropolitan Police Department said yesterday.

“Lt. Quarles Harris Jr., 24, who had been cooperating with a federal investigators, was found late Thursday night slumped dead inside a car, in front of the Judah House Praise Baptist Church in Northeast, said Cmdr. Michael Anzallo, head of the department’s Criminal Investigations Division.

“Cmdr. Anzallo said a police officer was patrolling the neighborhood when gunshots were heard, then Lt. Harris was found dead inside the vehicle, which investigators would describe only as a blue car.

“Emergency medics pronounced him dead at the scene.

“City police said they do not know whether his death was a direct result of his cooperation with federal investigators.

“We don’t have any information right now that connects his murder to that case,” Cmdr. Anzallo said.

“Police say a “shot spotter” device helped an officer locate Lt. Harris.

“A State Department spokeswoman yesterday declined to comment, saying the investigation into the passport fraud is ongoing.

“The Washington Times reported April 5 that contractors for the State Department had improperly accessed passport information for presidential candidates Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain, which resulted in a series of firings that reached into the agency’s top ranks.

“One agency employee, who was not identified in documents filed in U.S. District Court, was implicated in a credit-card fraud scheme after Lt. Harris told federal authorities he obtained “passport information from a co-conspirator who works for the U.S. Department of State.” “

There is a possibility that the breaches of the passport files associated with the “credit-card fraud scheme” were a cover for or associated with the breaches of the passport files by the employee of Brennan’s Analysis Corp. This certainly at least should be looked into.

July 11th Addendum to Report

1. Until June 2009, the reasonable doubts about where Obama was born could have quickly and finally been resolved if he had authorized the release by the Hawaiian Dept of Health of his original birth certificate or else applied for it himself and released it to the media. But as these doubts have increased and reached the point where they are no longer a “fringe” phenomenon, the Hawaiian state govt has recently taken certain steps that would create procedural and possibly legal barriers to a resolution of the controversy. Given the slipperiness that characterized the statements of Chiyome Fukino, the Dept’s Director, and Janice Okubo, the Dept’s spokesperson, to the media on this issue, it is, I think, also reasonable to regard these steps with suspicion.

A family that I am acquainted with has a child who was born in Hawaii 6 months ago. They filled out and mailed in a form to the Dept of Health, as did their doctor. In return the Dept sent them in the first week of June, 2009, the same abbreviated computer-generated form that last year on the Daily Kos and subsequently on the Obama campaign web site was called a “Certification of Live Birth”. The form that this family received this year is identical in format to the Certification of Live Birth on the Daily Kos web site with one exception: the title at the top of the form.

On June 12, 2008 the title for this abbreviated form was Certification of Live Birth. The title for the form that this family received in the first week of June 2009 is Certificate of Live Birth. I called The Dept of Health and confirmed that the title of the form had been changed. The bureaucrat that I spoke to said the change had been made “recently”, but could not or would not tell me when. Sometime between June 12, 2008 and the first week of June 2009 the Hawaiian Dept of Health changed the title of this abbreviated form from “Certification of Live Birth” to “Certificate of Live Birth“. Why?

The use of the word “Certificate” rather than “Certification” makes the form feel somewhat more like a traditional birth certificate than the “Certification of Live Birth” that the Daily Kos website and subsequently the Obama campaign posted on the Internet even though, like the “Certification“, it also lacks any information about the hospital, doctor, or midwife. There is no footprint etc. This renaming of the document will be very convenient for the Hawaiian Dept of Health in future stonewalling should any legal pressure be brought against them to produce Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth”. Instead of producing the original “Certificate of Live Birth”, they will produce the abbreviated “Certification of Live Birth” form that the Dept of Health has now renamed a “Certificate of Live Birth” and claim that they are doing so “in accordance with state policies and procedures” in the words of the Dept’s Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino.

But whether it is called (as it was last year) a Certification or (as it is now) a Certificate of Live Birth this abbreviated document provides none of the probative information that was or wasn’t on Barack Obama’s original Certificate of Live Birth. Unlike the Certificate of Live Birth of the time when Barack Obama was born, this new Certificate of Live Birth provides no real evidence of where a child was born or indication of where such evidence might be found. It provides no information that would demonstrate to the people of the United States whether there is convincing evidence that he was actually born here or whether a relative or two (or possibly even Barack Obama himself) just made a statement to that effect to a low level bureaucrat. (As is permitted under Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii.)

2. On June 7, 2009, a spokeswoman for the Hawaii Department of Health told a rather obvious lie (or engaged in a pretty transparent verbal deception) in another attempt to discourage further investigation into the issue of whether Barack Obama was born on Oahu. “The state Department of Health no longer issues copies of paper birth certificates as was done in the past”, said spokeswoman Janice Okubo. “The department only issues ‘certifications’ of live births, and that is the ‘official birth certificate’ issued by the state of Hawaii, she said. ” [Honolulu Star Bulletin] http://www.starbulletin.com/columnists/kokualine/20090606_kokua_line.html

This statement was false or deliberately very misleading. Here, from a Hawaii state document that was posted on June 10, 2009, is a description of how to apply for “the original Certificate of Live Birth” (the original birth certificate) as opposed to the Certification of Live Birth:

“In order to process your application [to prove native Hawaiian ancestry], DHHL [Department of Hawaiian Homelands] utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.

“Please note that DOH [Department of Health] no longer offers same day service. If you plan on picking up your certified DOH document(s), you should allow at least 10 working days for DOH to process your request(s), OR four to six weeks if you want your certified certificate(s) mailed to you.”

http://hawaii.gov/dhhl/applicants/appforms/applyhhl

Ms. Okubo’s statement gave the false impression that Obama could not gain access to or release “the original Certificate of Live Birth”, and that it was the DOH’s policy rather than his own reluctance that was responsible for the holding back of this Certificate. This was an obvious deception. The document at the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands website indicates that at the time she made this statement it was false, and that a procedure was in place for application for “the original Certificate of Live Birth.”

Only the information on the original birth certificate, “the original Certificate of Live Birth”, can demonstrate to the people of the United States whether there is convincing evidence that he was actually born here or whether a relative or two (or possibly even Barack Obama himself) just made a statement to that effect to a low level bureaucrat.

3. On July 8, 2009 the web site World Net Daily reported that “The state, which had excluded the controversial document [the Certification of Live Birth] as proof of native Hawaiian status, has changed its policy and now makes a point of including it.”

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103408

Here is the new statement on the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands web site [July 8, 2009]. “The Department of Hawaiian Home Lands accepts both Certificates of Live Birth [original birth certificates and the recently renamed abbreviated computer printouts] and Certifications of Live Birth [as the abbreviated computer printouts were up till recently called] because they are official government records documenting an individual’s birth… Although original birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth) are preferred for their greater detail, the State Department of Health (DOH) no longer issues Certificates of Live Birth. When a request is made for a copy of a birth certificate, the DOH issues a Certification of Live Birth.”

http://hawaii.gov/dhhl/applicants/appforms/applyhhl

The web site theobamafile.com picked up this significant change in procedure on the Dept of Hawaiian Homelands website on June 18, 2009. http://www.theobamafile.com/_BogusPOTUS/20090608.htm#HawaiiRuleChange

Sometime between June 10, 2009 and June 18, 2009 the State of Hawaii changed its rule on what documents and data were necessary to prove Hawaiian ancestry, thereby upgrading the apparent status of the abbreviated Certification of Live Birth which it had formerly regarded as insufficiently probative. Why?

4. On June 6, Janice Okubo, the Dept of Health spokeswoman, also told the Star Bulletin that “The electronic record of the birth is what (the Health Department) now keeps on file in order to provide same-day certified copies at our help window for most requests.” There is a troubling ambiguity in this statement. A sophisticated forensic investigation would probably be able to determine whether the original paper Certificate of Live Birth was forged, altered, or authentic. But if the data from the original paper Certificates of Live Birth has been transferred to an electronic record and then the original documents were discarded, part of the data could easily have been changed in the transfer or subsequently altered.Why did the Hawaiian Dept of Health wait until June 6, 2009 to announce to the world that the original paper Certificates of Live Birth had been destroyed (presumably in 2001)? Shouldn’t this have been part of Dr Fukino’s statement on October 31, 2008 (right before the November election), a statement which deceptively implied the contrary:“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”We know from a document posted on June 10, 2009 on the Department of Hawaiian Homelands website that, up until very recently, either the original paper Certificates of Live Birth or (as is now implied) scanned images of those paper certificates were maintained by the Dept of Health, and copies of them were provided to confirm claims of Hawaiian ancestry. But if in June 2009 the Department of Hawaiian Homelands has decided that it will no longer require the original Certificate of Live Birth as proof for special privileges and the Department of Health spokesman says firmly that they will no longer provide copies of these original certificates, is it possible that, in the midst of the controversy over where Barack Obama was born, the Hawaiian state govt has destroyed the original paper certificate of live birth? This seems almost incredible to me, but the authorities have been so deceptive and evasive on this issue, that it cannot be dismissed as impossible.

4. On June 6, Janice Okubo, the Dept of Health spokeswoman, also told the Star Bulletin that “The electronic record of the birth is what (the Health Department) now keeps on file in order to provide same-day certified copies at our help window for most requests.” There is a troubling ambiguity in this statement. A sophisticated forensic investigation would probably be able to determine whether the original paper Certificate of Live Birth was forged, altered, or authentic. But if the data from the original paper Certificates of Live Birth has been transferred to an electronic record and then the original documents were discarded, part of the data could easily have been changed in the transfer or subsequently altered.

Why did the Hawaiian Dept of Health wait until June 6, 2009 to announce to the world that the original paper Certificates of Live Birth had been destroyed (presumably in 2001)? Shouldn’t this have been part of Dr Fukino’s statement on October 31, 2008 (right before the November election), a statement which deceptively implied the contrary:

“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

We know from a document posted on June 10, 2009 on the Department of Hawaiian Homelands website that, up until very recently, either the original paper Certificates of Live Birth or (as is now implied) scanned images of those paper certificates were maintained by the Dept of Health, and copies of them were provided to confirm claims of Hawaiian ancestry. But if in June 2009 the Department of Hawaiian Homelands has decided that it will no longer require the original Certificate of Live Birth as proof for special privileges and the Department of Health spokesman says firmly that they will no longer provide copies of these original certificates, is it possible that, in the midst of the controversy over where Barack Obama was born, the Hawaiian state govt has destroyed the original paper certificate of live birth? This seems almost incredible to me, but the authorities have been so deceptive and evasive on this issue, that it cannot be dismissed as impossible.

See Original Story Here

Web Site Hit Counter
discount climbing gear